En gebruik hulle die Guptas daarvoor of was dit ‘n meevallertjie?
Gaan die Arabiese Lente, waarin die Sionisties-geïnspireerde Anglo-Amerikaanse magswêreld van hul uitgediende popregerings in die Moslemwêreld ontslae geraak het, nou 'n Afrika-winter word met die ANC-regime van Jacob Zuma 'n vername domino op die res van die vasteland om te val?
Dit is die vraag nadat die Anglo-Amerikaanse magswêreld, wat ten bate van die internasionale geldelite optree, in sy lyfblad, die Washington Post, 'n venynige berig oor ANC-korrupsie in die algemeen en die Gupta-fiasko in die besonder, gepubliseer het.
Bygesê: Hoewel geld aan die spreekwoordelike boom vir die sionistiese geldmag groei sedert die Rothschilds die Bank van Engeland in 'n vorige eeu oorgeneem en daarna in feitlik elke staat in die wêreld, ook in Suid-Afrika, vir hom 'n sogenaamde sentrale bank daargestel het, moet die geld-elite darem die pretensie van banksaldo en wins en verlies handhaaf. Dit is daarom dat die SA Kommunistiese Party 'n paar jaar gelede deur die Joodse kommunis Ben Turok in die bek geruk is weens die verdwyning van 'n paar miljoen.
'n Afrika-winter sal nietemin manna uit die hemel wees vir hierdie magselite wat onlangs by monde van Joe Biden (Amerikaanse vise-president en 'n geesdriftige lekker van die Sionistiese agterkant), aangekondig het die magselite is besig met die totale herrangskikking van die heersende wêreldorde. In hierdie herrangskikking speel die wêreld se bankstelsel en die aandelebeurse 'n sentrale rol. Die konfiskasie van Siprus se bankdeposito-houers (nie noodwendig Sipriote nie!) se bates was 'n sleutelskuif in die betoning van dié elite se mag om willekeurige beslissings op nie-elite-deelnemers aan die beleggerspel af te dwing.
Soos vleisbraai, brandewyn en Coke (en nie rugby self nie), te veel Afrikaners en ander witmense van ons land se nasionale spel geword het, so was korrupsie al voor die intrapslag die ANC se nasionale spel. Hoe ver terug loop die spoor van die wapenaankoopskandaal byvoorbeeld? Toe FW de Klerk nog aan bewind was?
Maar nou “ontdek” die Joodse geldmag by monde van die Washington Post dat daar darem die verskriklikste korrupsie in Suid-Afrika aan die gang is.
Die Amerikaanse koerant haal uit 'n berig van Associated Press en die Suid-Afrikaanse geldmag-publikasie, The Star, aan, net genoeg om sy liberale lesers te oortuig Zuma en sy regime onthaal nie net sy leërskare kaders meer as drie keer per dag vry, gratis en verniet in die wêreld en die land se top-restaurante en hotelle nie, hy doen dit die hele tyd.
Die gewone siel hier in ons land weet egter dis maar die punt van die seekoei se kalfie se oor wanneer die Washington Post skryf oor die Indiër-familie Gupta - op las en met die seën van Zuma - se gulsige vergrype aan dié wye, droewe land wat Suid-Afrika onder die ANC geword het.
Kom ons kyk hoe hierdie Joodse koerant wat in Amerika versprei word die Waterkloof-lugmagbasis onder hul Indiër-mededingers se makro-stralers probeer uitruk:
South Africa losing battle against growing corruption
May 03, 2013 05:57 PM EDT
JOHANNESBURG — South Africa is fighting a losing battle against corruption which sucked up nearly 1 billion rand ($111 million) in taxpayers’ money last year, according to a new report that contradicts government statements that efforts to stamp out financial misconduct are going well.
“Corruption is rampant,” the author of the report, financial forensics expert Peter Allwright, said Friday. “It’s out of control ... and the dedicated units that have been created to fight financial misconduct are in essence fighting a losing battle.”
South Africa is awash in scandals about misuse of government money and power — in one of the latest, taxpayers forked out around 250 million rand (nearly $28 million) on upgrades to President Jacob Zuma’s private residence in his home village, including three new houses, a sewerage treatment plant and an underground bunker.
South Africans outraged by the lavish expenditure and disbelieving of their president’s claims that he did not know how much it cost or any details of the upgrade have been asking how many homes that money could have built for some of the millions of citizens who live without running water or electricity.
The gulf between the fabulously wealthy and the impoverished is growing ever wider in the country with the continent’s largest economy, fueling ever more violent service delivery protests as the African National Congress, which has governed since white minority rule ended in 1994, gears up for elections next year. The ANC is expected to win but its margins of victory get lower at every election where fewer and fewer people vote.
People calling into radio talk shows have been wondering whether corruption is not one of the reasons that Britain announced this week it is ending development aid to South Africa in 2015. British aid this year amounts to $29.5 million — slightly more than the government has spent on Zuma’s private residence.
In what is seen as an influence-peddling scandal, four security officials including two brigadiers-general were suspended Friday in a political firestorm over why an immigrant Indian family that is friendly with Zuma and a major contributor to his party was allowed to land a chartered jet without proper authorization at the country’s main air force military base.
The South African National Defense Force has said it was not informed in what is considered a serious breach of security.
The incident “tells us who we are,” The Star newspaper said in an editorial. “If you have money and friends in powerful places, you can do as you wish.”
Allwright told The Associated Press that while 88 percent of people tried for financial misconduct are found guilty, only 19 percent are dismissed. Forty-three percent get final written warnings.
“Essentially you have a one-in-five chance of being dismissed and the rest remain in the public service and continue with financial misconduct because there are no real consequences,” said Allwright, an attorney with law firm Edward Nathan Sonnenbergs.
Others are able “to get off scot-free” by resigning and getting another government job where they can continue to steal, he said. That was because an insufficient investigative capacity in the public service means nearly two-thirds of cases take more than 90 days to investigate. “You can give 30 days’ notice and leave, and the public service office then often abandons the investigation,” Allwright said.