winde van veranderingDit is soos ‘n vars politieke bries van verandering wat in die teenoorgestelde rigting waai as dié van Harold McMillan, voormalige eerste minister van Brittanje! Of dit dieselfde effek gaan hê, soos bv. die sluipmoord op dr. Verwoerd, met die gevolglike verrotting van die NP se beginsel en beleidsrigting, wat ons by die Afrikastandaard van vandag gebring het, is ‘n oop vraag!

Om mee te begin is dit egter ‘n direkte bevestiging van die standpunte van dr. Verwoerd en al sy voorgangers na genls. Louis Botha en Jan Smuts en die spesifike rede vir die beleidsrigting wat hulle gevolg het.

Of Mashele wat die onderstaande artikel geskryf het sy uitgesproke briljante en baie sinvolle oortuiging gehad het voor sy universiteitsopleiding en selfs lank daarna, val te betwyfel. Sy uitlatings in die artikel van Mei 2016, sy verklaarde begrip van die Afrika kultuur en die noodwendige gevolge daarvan wat hy boekstaaf, is merkwaardig en spreek van insig!

Behalwe dat dit die spesifieke rede was vir die beleidsrigting van die Afrikanervolk soos verstaan en ge-implimenteer   deur Afrikanerleiers na 1948 se oorwinning oor die liberale sienings van Botha en Smuts, bevestig Prince Mashele met sy uitspraak ‘n hele paar feite!

Eerstens dat die de Klerk regering van voor 1994, die FW Stigting, VF positief, Solidariteit, Afriforum en die DA van vandag, géén begrip van die Afrikapolitiek gehad het en nou nog nie het nie. Tweedens dat hulle volgehoue pogings om ‘n stelsel van samewerking met die swart ras te maak werk, in teenstelling met Afrika as aanskouingsles, saamgelees met die waarskuwings van Afrikanerleiers dat dit die blanke en Suid Afrika sal vernietig, nie anders as verraad vertolk kan word nie.

Derdens dat die AVP die enigste politieke party is wat nog nugter oor hierdie sake gebly het en die Afrikanervolk weer langs die bewese suksesvolle nasionalistiese riglyne wil bymekaarmaak. Dat hy alles egter aan Zuma toeskryf negeer sy vertolking van die Afrika kultuur wat hy so duidelik ontleed het!


By Prince Mashele | May 09, 2016

Prince Mashele

In the midst of the political confusion that has gripped our country many people are wondering if we have come to the end of South Africa.

The answer is simple: the thing called an "end" does not exist, not in relation to a country. SA will be there long after Jacob Zuma is gone.

What Zuma has done is to make us come to the realisation that ours is just another African country, not some exceptional country on the southern tip of the African continent.

During the presidency of Nelson Mandela and Thabo Mbeki, some among us used to believe that the black people of SA are better than those of other African countries.

We must all thank Zuma for revealing our true African character; that the idea of rule of law is not part of who we are, and that constitutionalism is a concept far ahead of us as a people.

How else are we to explain the thousands of people who flock to stadiums to clap hands for a president who has violated their country's constitution? Such people have no idea of constitutionalism.

Now that we have reclaimed our place as another African country, we must reflect on and come to terms with our real character, and imagine what our future portends.

In a typical African country, ordinary people don't expect much of politicians, because people get tired of repeated empty promises.

In a typical African country, people have no illusions about the unity of morality and governance. People know that those who have power have it for themselves and their friends and families.

The idea that the state is an instrument for people's development is a Western concept, and has been copied by pockets of Asian countries.

Africans and their leaders don't like to copy from the West. They are happy to remain African, and do things "the African way".

The African way is rule by kings, chiefs and indunas in a setting of unwritten rules. Is there anyone who has seen a book of African customary laws?

The idea that a commoner can raise questions about public money spent on the residence of a king is not African. The ANC MPs who have been defending Zuma are true Africans.

Asking a ruler to be accountable is a foreign - Western - idea. In a situation where there is conflict between a ruler and laws, Africans simply change the laws to protect the ruler. This is why no single white person has called for King Dalindyebo to be released from jail.

The problem with clever blacks is that they think they live in Europe, where ideas of democracy have been refined over centuries.

What we need to do is to come back to reality, and accept that ours is a typical African country. Such a return to reality will give us a fairly good idea of what SA's future might look like.

This country will not look like Denmark. It might look like Nigeria, where anti-corruption crusaders are an oddity.

Being an African country, ours will not look like Germany. SA might look like Kenya, where tribalism drives politics.

People must not entertain the illusion that a day is coming when SA will look like the US. Our future is more on the side of Zimbabwe, where one ruler is more powerful than the rest of the population. Even if Julius Malema were to become president, it would still be the same.

African leaders don't like the idea of an educated populace, for clever people are difficult to govern. Mandela and Mbeki were themselves corrupted by Western education. (Admission: this columnist is also corrupted by such education.)

Zuma remains African. His mentality is in line with Boko Haram. He is suspicious of educated people; what he calls "clever blacks". Remember that Boko Haram means "Against Western Education".

The people who think we have come to the end of SA don't realise that we have actually come to the beginning of a real African country, away from the Western illusions of exceptionalism. Those who are unsettled by this true African character need help. The best we can do for them is to ask them to look north of the Limpopo River, to learn more about governance in Africa.

What makes most people restless about the future of SA is that they have Western models in mind, forgetting that ours is an Africa country.

The idea that a president can resign simply because a court of law has delivered an adverse judgment is Western. Only the Prime Minister of Iceland does that; African rulers will never do that.

Analysed carefully, the notion of SA coming to an "end" is an expression of a Western value system - of accountability, political morality, reason, and so on. All these are lofty ideas of Socrates, Kant, Hegel, and so on. They are not African.

All of us must thank Jacob Zuma for introducing us to the real African Republic of South Africa, not some outpost of European values.